20th Century Dag
Home › Forums › Daguerrian Culture, History, and Theory › 20th Century Dag
- This topic has 10 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by Sean Culver.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 16, 2008 at 7:45 am #7818botticelli1972Participant
I do not know if this helps but I did notice an article by Grant Romer in the bibliography for the Kilgo book on Thomas Easterly. It was titled something like "The Daguerreotype in American and England after 1860" Published in the History of Photography 1 sometime in the 1970’s ( I do not have the exact reference with me at this time). I have not located the article yet but possibly it has references to persons of interest practicing in the 20th C.
July 16, 2008 at 9:29 am #7820Jon LewisMemberI pulled this reference from the Daguerreian Society’s Survey of Daguerreian Literature: The Contemporary Daguerreotype
Romer, Grant B. "The Daguerreotype in America and England after 1860." History of Photography 1, #1 (July 1977), pp. 201-212. Very important article dealing primarily with M.J. Steffens, Charles Tremear, Ray Phillips, and Irving Pobboravsky but also reproducing daguerreotypes by Romer and Harvey Zucker.Thanks for the tip! I’m going to see if I can track it down…
July 19, 2008 at 5:46 pm #7821Andy StocktonParticipantHere’s a New York Times article about a contemporary artist (Adam Fuss) working with dagurerreotypes:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h … sec=&spon=
I was surprised by the size mentioned (20×24). Wow.
July 31, 2008 at 5:48 pm #7822Jon LewisMemberI chased down Romer’s article and it’s a fascinating read! As the title suggests, he traces the practice of daguerreotypy the decline of it’s popularity through to the 1970s. It’s amazing that someone has always been interested in the process. Though I think there are more daguerreotypists now than any time since the end of the daguerreian era.
If anyone wants a copy of the article send me an email or a private message…
Andy – I’ve run across a couple references to David Burder (a stereo photographer) who created a 24×48 daguerreotype in 2003. I believe it was a Becquerel dag and it’s supposed to have been a world record though I haven’t found enough info to really verify the whole thing.
July 31, 2008 at 6:19 pm #7823Andy StocktonParticipantAmazing. 24×48! I’m having trouble deciding on a polishing method to do a sixth plate! There are so many different choices and so little agreement on methods. Have you made a choice yet?
July 31, 2008 at 8:47 pm #7824Jon LewisMemberIt’s a bit off topic though polishing does seem to find it’s way into every aspect of daguerreotypy
” title=”Wink” />
I’m going to go with the hotly debated random orbital sander, silk velvet, and rouge method. I’d rather use a more traditional buffing paddle with buckskin but I don’t have the equipment to build one right now and I’m itching to get some plates in the camera. The random orbital sander will just work better for me at this point and I’ll just have to make it work.
August 1, 2008 at 3:23 am #7825drdagParticipantIndeed David Burder did make the worlds largest dag. It was shown on the BBC programme ‘What The Victorians Did For Us’. He is a very nice, incredibly bright man , he came to the private view of my London show last month.He is also the worlds’ authority on 3D imaging.
August 1, 2008 at 8:48 am #7826Jon LewisMemberIf I had been a bit smarter I would have realized that in the resources section there is an account of David Burder’s daguerreotypy. Included is his Big Bertha 24×48 daguerreotype equipment. He also played with color daguerreotypes as well as lenticular!
I need to sit down and read it more carefully but I have to get to work before I’m any later than I already am!
February 9, 2009 at 1:58 am #7936CasedImageKeymasterDoes anyone know anything about these items, I’ve seen them on ebay before and wonder if some 20th century daguerreotypist was actually making them, maybe copy dags of prints or is it just the terminology being borrowed?
www.CasedImage.com
April 10, 2009 at 5:46 pm #8038Sean CulverParticipantYes, I heard about these from Jerry S. who has a great story about the Baseball Daguerreotypes, which are not daguerreotypes at all. I’ll let him tell you his story.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.